Archive

Volume 1, Number 2 / August issue 2015
Robyn D. Rausch, Lisa Dykes-Harrell
The influence of technology on parent responsiveness
Abstract

Objective. Technology in the homes has been increasing in the new millennium, and has changed how parents and children interact. The goal of this study was to explore whether parents use technology in responsive ways that support childhood development or unresponsive ways that disrupt the parent-child relationship. Design. This study used a likert scale survey to ask 40 parents (ages 24-42) how they use technology with their children (ages 3-8). Results. Parents use technology in both responsive and unresponsive ways; however, parents appear to use technology more often to be responsive rather than to disrupt the relationship. Conclusions. Parents appear to use technology responsively with their children more often than unresponsively. These findings contrast modern media and the single previously published study that was found. These results provide guidance for encouraging the use of technology by parents to support child development.
Keywords: Technology, Parent-Child, Responsiveness, Child Development

Cite this article:
Robyn D. Rausch, Lisa Dykes-Harrell. The influence of technology on parent responsiveness. Acta Scientiae et Intellectus, 1(2), 29-37.


REFERENCES

  1. Alegre, A. (2011). Parenting styles and children's emotional intelligence: What do we know? The Family Journal, 19(56), 56-62. doi: 10.1177/1066480710387486
  2. American Academic of Pediatrics. (n.d.). The social emotional development of young children: Resource guide for healthy start staff. Washington, DC: National Healthy Start Association. Retrieved on June 13, 2014 from http://www.nationalhealthystart.org/resources/nhsa_publications
  3. Bandura, A. (1962). Social Learning through Imitation. University of Nebraska Press: Lincoln, NE.
  4. Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Clinical Applications of Attachment Theory. Routledge. London.
  5. Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2010). The longitudinal relations among dimensions of parenting styles, sympathy, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral development, 35(2), 116-124. doi: 10.1177/0165025410375921
  6. Cornell, A. H., & Frick, P. J. (2007). The moderating effect of parenting styles in the association between behavioral inhibition and parent-reported guilt and empathy in preschool children. Journal of Clinical and Adolescent Psychology, 36(3), 305-318.
  7. DeGaetano, G. (2010). Significant changes impacting parenting over the last 30years - 7 years to stay sane and centered. Ezine Articles, Retrieved on June 15, 2014 from http://ezinearticles.com/?Significant-Changes-Impacting-Parenting-Over-the-Last-30-Years---7-Ideas-to-Stay-Sane-and-Centered&id=4772797
  8. Erikson, E.H. (1980). Identity and the Life Cycle. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
  9. Hastings, P. D., Utendale, W. T., & Sullivan, C. (2007). The socialization of prosocial development. In J. Grusec & P. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research (pp. 638-664). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
  10. Hoeve, M., Dubas, J.S., Gerris, J.R.M., Van Der Laan, P.H., & Smeenk, W. (2011). Maternal and paternal parenting styles: Unique and combined links to adolescent and early adult delinquency. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 813-827. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.02.004
  11. Maggi, S., Irwin, L. J., Siddiqi, A., & Hertzman, C. (2010). The social determinants of early child development: An overview. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 46, 627-635. doi: 10.111/j.1440-1754.2010.01817.x
  12. Michiels, D., Grietens, H., Onghena, P., & Kuppens, S. (2008). Parent-child interactions and relational aggression in peer relationships. Developmental Review, 28, 522-540. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2008.08.002
  13. Milevsky, A., Schlechter, Netter, & Keehn. (2006). Maternal and paternal parenting styles in adolescents: Associations with self-esteem, depression, and life-satisfaction. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 39-47. doi: 10.1007/s10826-006-9066-5
  14. Miller, J.B., & Stiver, I. (1997). The Healing Connection. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  15. Mullin, A. (2012). The ethical and social significance of parenting: A philosophical approach. Parenting: Science and practice, 12, 134-143. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2012.683339
  16. Newmark, G. (1999). How to raise emotionally healthy children: Meeting the five critical needs of children and parents too. Tarzana, CA: NMI Publishers.
  17. Radesky, J. S., Kistin, C. J., Zuckerman, B., Nitzberg, K., Gross, J., Kaplan-Sanoff, M.... Silverstein, M. (2014). Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast food restaurants. Pediatrics, 2014 (133), doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3703
  18. Rinaldi, C. M., & Howe, N. (2012). Mothers' and fathers' parenting styles and associations with toddlers' externalizing, internalizing, and adaptive behaviors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 266-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.08.001
  19. Ransona, K. E., & Urichuka, L. J. (2008). The effect of parent-child attachment relationships on child biopsychosocial outcomes: A review. Early Child Development and Care, 178(2), 129-152. doi: 10.1080/03004430600685282
  20. Morris, A., Silk, J. S., Steinberg, L., Myers, S. S., & Robinson, L. R. (2007). The role of family context in the development of emotion regulation. Social Development, 16(2), 361-388. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007. 00389.x
  21. The Literary Link. (n.d.). Understanding children. Retrieved on June 04, 2014 from http://theliterarylink.com/understanding.html
  22. Von Suchodoletz, A., Trommsdorff, G., & Heikamp, T. (2010). Linking maternal warmth and responsiveness to children's self-regulation. Social Development, 20(3), 486-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2010. 00588.x