Archive

Volume 3, Number 4 / August issue 2017
William Babb
Nursing and constructivism: A novel pediatric ICU nurse orientation program for newly graduated nurses
Abstract

The orientation process for newly graduated registered nurses (RNs) is extremely important as these RNs work to put theoretical learning into the practice of nursing care. During orientation, a new nurse begins what can be a harrowing process starting on a continuum that progresses from novice to competent nursing professional. Movement along this continuum can seem more distressing for new RNs in the pediatric critical care setting as the natures of both pediatric and critical care nursing are taken into consideration. The purpose of this paper is to detail the new graduate orientation efforts undertaken by a Southwestern United States Level One trauma center pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Employing key elements from Benner’s Novice to Expert model, Fawcett’s metaparadigm components, and constructivist learning principles, this PICU has structured a 17-week new graduate nurse orientation program. This orientation program has succeeded in “building” and nurturing newly graduated RNs who can not only care for critically ill children, but who also have the nursing knowledge foundation to teach other new nurses.
Keywords: Nursing, Constructivism, RNs, PICU

Cite this article:
William Babb. Nursing and constructivism: A novel pediatric ICU nurse orientation program for newly graduated nurses. Acta Scientiae et Intellectus, 3(4)2017, 42-55.


REFERENCES

  1. Benner, P. (2000). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. (Commemorative Ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  2. Bradbury-Jones, C., Irvine, F., Sambrook, S. (2010) Empowerment of nursing students in clinical practice: Spheres of influence. Journal of Advanced Nursing (66)9, 2061-2070. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05351.x
  3. Brandon, A., All, A. (2010). Constructivism theory analysis and application to curricula. Nursing Education Perspectives, (31)2, 89-92. PMID: 20455364
  4. Charalambous, A. (2010). Interpreting patients as a means of clinical practice: Introducing nursing hermeneutics. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47, 1283-1291. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.02.011.
  5. Fawcett, J. (2013). Contemporary nursing knowledge: Analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories (2nd Ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
  6. Giddens, J., & Brady, D. (2007) Rescuing nursing education from content saturation: The case for a concept-based curriculum. Journal of Nursing Education, (46)2, 65-69. PMID: 17315564
  7. Harland, T. (2003). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development and problem-based learning: Linking a theoretical concept with practice through action research. Teaching in Higher Education (8)2, 263-272. doi: 10.1080/1356251032000052483
  8. Hodges, H. (2011) Preparing new nurses with complexity science and problem-based learning. Journal of Nursing Education, (50)1, 7-13. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20101029-01
  9. Kantar, l. (2011) Incorporation of constructivist assumptions into problem-based instruction: A literature review. Nurse Education in Practice, (14)3, 233-241. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2013.08.010
  10. McAllister, M., Searl, K., Davis, S. (2013) Who is that masked educator? Deconstructing the teaching and learning processes of an innovative humanistic simulation technique. Nurse Education Today (33)12, 1453-1458. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.015
  11. Naude, L., van den Bergh, T., Kruger, I. (2014) “Learning to like learning”: An appreciative inquiry into emotions in education. Social Psychology of Education (17)2, 211-228. doi: 10.1007/s11218-014-9247-9.
  12. Schmidt, H., Rotgan, J., Yew, E. (2011) The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45, 792-806. doi: 10.111/j.1365-2923.2.11.04035.x
  13. Woolley, N., Jarvis, Y. (2007) Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: A model for teaching and learning clinical skills in a technologically rich and authentic learning environment. Nurse Education Today (27)1, 73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.02.010