Archive

Volume 7, Number 3 / June issue 2021
Damar Angga Saputra, Yetrie Ludang, Firlianty, Yanarita, Noor Syarifuddin Yusuf, Indrawan Permana Kamis
Potential attraction of ecotourism in Sebangau National Park, Central Kalimantan
Abstract

Tourism activities in national park areas pose a challenge to be able to balance efforts to protect and maintain ecosystems with efforts to utilize the area from the tourism sector. National park area management models that can provide financial benefits from the tourism aspect have been widely applied. This model, among others, through the zoning of national parks. In the management of ecotourism, Natural Tourism Objects and Attractions (ODTW) provide important meaning for the sustainability of a tourist area, in addition to supporting facilities and infrastructure, as well as publications. Foresight in seeing tourism potential is very important in order to create a diversity of natural ODTWs in an area, and to package them into superior natural ODTWs, and attract tourists to visit. Handling natural ODTW requires the seriousness of the tourism area manager, both in exploring the potential of existing natural ODTW and efforts to manage it. In managing natural ODTW, understanding the nature or characteristics of natural ODTW is needed in order to find the right form of management.
Keywords: ecotourism, national park, management, tourism products, biodiversity

Cite this article:
Damar Angga Saputra, Yetrie Ludang, Firlianty, Yanarita, Noor Syarifuddin Yusuf, Indrawan Permana Kamis. Potential attraction of ecotourism in Sebangau National Park, Central Kalimantan. Acta Scientiae et Intellectus, 7(3)2021, 49-59.


REFERENCES

  1. Adhikerana, A.S. (1999). Ekowisata di Indonesia Antara Angan-Angan dan Kenyataan. Makalah Seminar. Perkembangan Industri Pariwisata di Indonesia. Bandung. 10 hal.
  2. Benson J.F., Roe. M.H. (editor), (2000). Landscape and Sustainability. Spoon Press. London. 318p.
  3. Darmawan, Widuriyani (2004). Perencanaan Hutan Rawa Payau untuk Ekowisata di Kota Baru Bandar Kemayoran, Jakarta. Skripsi. Departemen Budidaya Pertanian Program Studi Arsitektur Lanskap Fakultas Pertanian IPB. Bogor (Unpublished).
  4. DK, 2006. Departemen Kehutanan Republik Indonesia (2006). Kemungkinan Meningkatkan Ekowisata. http//www.dephut.go.id/Informasi/PHPA/mphpa1.html.
  5. Fandeli, C. (2000). Pengusahaan Ekowisata. Fakultas Kehutanan UGM kerjasama dengan Unit KSDA Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar Offset.Yogyakarta.
  6. Fandeli, C. (2002). Perencanaan Kepariwisataan Alam. Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Gadjah Mada, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta.
  7. Husni Kotta, Sarwoko Mangkoedihardjo, Yetrie Ludang, Slamet Trisutomo (2018). The design of riparian zone in waterfront area of Tanjung Bunga, Makassar. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(8): 580-584.
  8. Kusumawardani, A. (2004). Perencanaan Kawasan Pesisir untuk Ekowisata di Tulamben Karangasem, Bali. Skripsi. Departemen Budidaya Pertanian Program Studi Arsitektur Lanskap Fakultas Pertanian IPB. Bogor (Unpublished).
  9. Law no. 5 of 1990 concerning Conservation of Biological Natural Resources and Their Ecosystems.
  10. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 10 of 2009 concerning tourism.
  11. Lembanasari, A. (2006). Evaluasi Model Kampung Konsevasi di Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun-Salak. Skripsi. Departemen Konservasi Sumberdaya Hutan dan Ekowisata Fakultas Kehutanan IPB. Bogor (tidak dipublikasikan).
  12. Ludang, Y. (2010). A brief review on the role of community to lessen the rate of global warming. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 6(1): 69-75.
  13. Migang, R.S. (2019). Manfaat Ekowisata di taman nasional Sebangau. Welcome to Borneo Tourism Watch (BTW). Media Non Komersil-Mitra Strategis bagi Kemajuan Pariwisata Indonesia dari Kalimantan.
  14. Murhaini, S. & Ludang, Y. (2020). Sociological Aspects of Transferred Land to Settlements in Indonesia. International Journal of Management, 11(3): 247-255.
  15. Nurisjah, S. (2007). Perencanaan Lanskap. Departemen Arsitektur Lanskap Fakultas Pertanian IPB. Bogor (Unpublished).
  16. Pindi (1998). Studi Ekoturisme Taman Wisata Alam Pangandaran dan Sekitarnya Kabupaten Ciamis, Jawa Barat. Skripsi. Jurusan Manajemen Sumberdaya Perikanan Fakultas Perikanan IPB. Bogor (tidak dipublikasikan).
  17. Rina Oktavia, Agus Haryono, Yohanes Edy Gunawan, Yetrie Ludang, Abdul Hadjaranul Fatah, Alpian (2020). The effectiveness of blended learning method by using environmental pollution materials. Acta Scientiae et Intellectus, 6(3): 87-97.
  18. Setianingsih, D. (2016). Studi Keanekaragaman Jenis Kantong Semar (Nepenthessp) dan Serangga yang Terjebak di dalamnya di Taman Nasional Sebangau Resort Habaring Hurung”, Skripsi. FTIK Prodi Tadris Biologi IAIN Palangka Raya.
  19. Simond, J.O. (2006). Landscape Architecture. McGraw-Hill. New York. Soepardi, Goeswono. 1998. Sifat dan Ciri Tanah 2. Departemen Ilmu Tanah. Fakultas Pertanian IPB. Bogor.
  20. Suwantoro, G. (2004). Dasar-dasar Pariwisata. Andi. Yogyakarta.
  21. Wahyudi, D. (2004). Perencanaan Lanskap Kawasan Ekowisata Lahan Basah Cagar Alam Rawa Danau, Serang, Banten. Skripsi. Departemen Budidaya Pertanian Program Studi Arsitektur Lanskap Fakultas Pertanian IPB. Bogor (tidak dipublikasikan).
  22. Walidonna, A. (2020). Penjadwalan & Pengendalian Proyek Desain Lansekap Pariwisata Menggunakan Critical Chain Project Management (Ccpm) (Doctoral Dissertation, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember).